The following sample ballot lists all items that will appear on ballots in Williamson County for the May 2, 2026 election. Individual resident ballots are based on which precinct they live in.
CITY
Georgetown
City Council District 6
Vote for one
- Emily Kaye Kipp
- Jake French
Proposition A
The sale of a portion of the City of Georgetown, Texas's water utility system located outside of its corporate limits to National Utility Infrastructure in the aggregate principal amount of not less than $20,000,000.00.
- For
- Against
Bartlett
City Council
Vote for none, one, or two
- Jackie Ivicic
- Jennifer Tucker
- Ruth Diaz
Cedar Park
Mayor
Vote for one
- Jim Penniman-Morin
- Dean Doscher
Council Place Two
Vote for one
- Mel Kirkland
- Darron Jurajda
Council Place Four
Vote for one
- Michael Endres
- Kevin O'Bryan
Council Place Six
Vote for one
- Randy Strader
- Shweta Padmanabha
Proposition A
Extension And Contraction Of Boundaries: Shall Section 1.03 and Section 1.04 of the Cedar Park City Charter be amended to remove excess language and authorize extension and contraction of the City of Cedar Park's boundaries in accordance with state law?
- For
- Against
Proposition B
General Authority: Shall Section 2.01 and Section 2.02 of the Cedar Park City Charter be combined into a single Section 2.01 and amended to clarify the City of Cedar Park's general authority as a home rule municipality, including the full power of self-government and all of the express and implied powers, functions, rights, privileges, and immunities in accordance with state law?
- For
- Against
Proposition C
Eminent Domain: Shall Section 2.03 of the Cedar Park City Charter be amended to remove excess language and require payment of just compensation for any property acquired by condemnation in accordance with state law?
- For
- Against
Proposition D
Compensation: Shall Section 3.04 of the Cedar Park City Charter be amended to provide compensation at $1,000 per month for Councilmembers and $1,500 per month for Mayor and reimbursement for expenses incurred in the performance of their official duties, upon approval by the Council, and without rendering the Mayor or Councilmembers employees of the city?
- For
- Against
Proposition E
General Authority: Shall Section 3.05 of the Cedar Park City Charter be amended to remove reference to "plats" in accordance with state law?
- For
- Against
Proposition F
Filling Of Vacancies: Shall Section 3.06 of the Cedar Park City Charter be amended to remove the deadline for Council's adoption of a procedure to fill vacancies?
- For
- Against
Proposition G
Prohibitions: HoldingOther Office: Shall Section 3.08 of the Cedar Park City Charter be amended to extend the prohibition against holding any compensated appointive City office or City employment from one (1) year to two (2) years after the expiration of a person's term as Mayor or Councilmember, in accordance with Cedar Park Code of Ordinances, Art. 7.02 Revolving Door Policy?
- For
- Against
Proposition H
Ordinances In General: Publication Notice: Shall Section 3.13 of the Cedar Park City Charter be amended to allow for publication notices in accordance with state law?
- For
- Against
Proposition I
Emergency Ordinances: Shall Section 3.14 of the Cedar Park City Charter be amended to remove a redundant provision restating that adoption of an emergency ordinance requires an affirmative vote of four (4) Councilmembers?
- For
- Against
Proposition J
City Attorney: Shall Section 4.03 of the Cedar Park City Charter be amended to expressly provide for the City Attorney's representation of the City of Cedar Park in all litigation and legal proceedings?
- For
- Against
Proposition K
Voter Eligibility List: Shall Section 5.01 of the Cedar Park City Charter be amended to remove the requirement for maintenance of a voter eligibility list by the City Secretary in accordance with state law?
For
Against
Proposition L
Form Of Petitions: Shall Section 6.03 of the Cedar Park City Charter be amended to
remove signature validity or verification requirements in accordance with state law?
- For
- Against
Proposition M
Failure To Call Recall Election: Delegation Of Duties: Shall Section 6.11 of the Cedar Park City Charter be amended to remove the provision proposing to delegate the City Secretary's duties to the Williamson County Judge in accordance with state law?
- For
- Against
Proposition N
Prohibitions: General: Shall Section 11.04, Section 11.05, Section 11.08, and Section 11.09 of the Cedar Park City Charter be amended to consolidate and clarify provisions in accordance with state law?
- For
- Against
Proposition O
Charter Review: Shall Section 11.13 of the Cedar Park City Charter be amended to allow the appointment of either a seven (7) member or a fifteen (15) member citizen Charter Review Committee and to provide reasonable access to staff and records?
- For
- Against
Florence
Mayor
Vote for one
- David Merideth
- Ben Daniel
Alderpersons
Vote for none, one, or two
- Ashley Gilland
- Jose R. Perez
- Renee Morgan
- Forrest Hyde
- Brett Banks
Granger
City Council
Choose one, two, three, or none
- Lori Gick
- Ron Marx
- Mark Matoska
- Denise Stefek
Hutto
Councilmember Place 1
Vote for one
- Jerrel W. Reynolds
- Sarosh Jafri
- Brandy McCool
- Luiz Dunham
Councilmember Place 4
Vote for one
- Brandon DeLeon
- Corina I. Zepeda
Liberty Hill
Proposition A
The reauthorization of the local sales and use tax in the City of Liberty Hill, Texas, at the rate of one-fourth of one percent (0.25%) to continue providing revenue for maintenance and repair of municipal streets. The tax expires on the fourth anniversary date of this election unless the imposition of the tax is reauthorized. An election is hereby ordered to be held on May 2, 2026, for the purpose of the reauthorization of the Street Maintenance Sales Tax at a rate of 1/4% to continue providing revenue for maintenance and repair of municipal streets of the City of Liberty Hill, Texas.
- For
- Against
Round Rock
Mayor
Vote for one
- Kelly Hall
- Craig Morgan
City Council, Place 1
Vote for one
- Michelle Ly
City Council, Place 4
Vote for one
- Frank Ortega
Proposition A
Shall the Home Rule Charter of the City of Round Rock, Texas, be amended to add Section 14.16 to Article 14 to allow up to twelve (12) privately owned, operated, and funded freestanding off-premise double-faced electronic message centers located on private property adjacent to Interstate Highway 35 and State Highway 45 within the city and its extraterritorial jurisdiction; require priority public safety messaging; and limit regulation of location, size, and spacing to standards adopted by the Texas Department of Transportation?
- For
- Against
Proposition B
Shall the Home Rule Charter of the City of Round Rock, Texas, be amended to add Article XVI to require the City of Round Rock Fire Department to implement the NFPA 1710 minimum staffing levels and performance objectives for alarm answering, alarm processing, turnout, and travel times; require phased deadlines between 2027 and 2037 for compliance; require a
biennial analysis for compliance to be conducted by the International Association of Fire Fighters (IAFF); and require the waiver of sovereign immunity by the city for any enforcement suits for non-compliance?
- For
- Against
Taylor
Mayor
Vote for one
- Sandra O. Wolff
- Taylor Stubbs
- Jim Buzan
Thrall
Proposition A
The reauthorization of a local sales and use tax in the City of Thrall, Texas, at the rate of one-fourth of one percent to continue providing revenue for maintenance and repair of municipal streets. The tax expires on the fourth anniversary of the date of this election unless the imposition of the tax is reauthorized.
- For
- Against
INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT
Bartlett ISD
District Trustee
Vote for none, one, or two
- Nicole Sharp
- Joshua Spieglehauer
- Zachary Buchhorn
Proposition A
THIS IS A PROPERTY TAX INCREASE. The issuance of not to exceed $12,500,000 of Bartlett Independent School District school building bonds for the purposes of designing, constructing, renovating, improving, upgrading, updating, acquiring, and equipping school facilities with
priority given to instructional classroom additions; a new AG Vocational Building; safety and
security initiatives, transportation related projects, the purchase of the necessary sites for school facilities, and the purchase of new school buses, and the levying of a tax sufficient to pay the principal and interest on the bonds and the cost of any credit agreements executed in connection with the Bonds.
- For
- Against
Proposition B
THIS IS A PROPERTY TAX INCREASE. The issuance of not to exceed $3,300,000 of Bartlett Independent School District refunding bonds for the purpose of refunding all or a portion of the principal, interest, and redemption premium on previously issued maintenance tax obligations of the District styled "Bartlett Independent School District Maintenance Tax Notes, Series 2024, dated March 1, 2024" and the levying of a tax sufficient to pay the principal and interest on the bonds and the cost of any credit agreements executed in connection with the Bonds.
- For
- Against
Proposition C
THIS IS A PROPERTY TAX INCREASE. The issuance of not to exceed $1,000,000 of Bartlett Independent School District refunding bonds for the purpose of refunding all or a portion of the
principal, interest, and redemption premium on previously issued time warrants of the District styled "Bartlett Independent School District Time Warrants, Series 2024, dated March 1, 2024" and the levying of a tax sufficient to pay the principal and interest on the bonds and the cost of any credit agreements executed in connection with the Bonds.
- For
- Against
Granger ISD
District Trustee
Vote for no more than three
- Ricky Luna
- Jen David
- David Tucker
- Daryl J. Stefek
- Jason Huf
- Rosangel Rodriguez
Hutto ISD
District Board of Trustees
Vote for no more than two
- Felix Chavez
- April Adams
- Samantha Martinez
- Taylor Lopez
- Lynn Green
Liberty Hill ISD
District Board of Trustees, Place 1
Vote for one or none
- Kevin J. Weber
- Chris Neighbors
- Albert Kennedy
District Board of Trustees, Place 2
Vote for one or none
- Kendall Carter
District Board of Trustees, Place 4
Vote for one or none
- Jamie Etzkorn
- Sharon Yager
- Antonio Canas
Thrall ISD
District School Board Trustee At Large
Vote for none, one, or two
- Bryan Holubec
- Jason Seaton
- Ashley Harper
- Joshua Seagroves
LIMITED DISTRICT
Anderson Mill Limited District
Board of Directors, Place 4
Vote for one
- Mike Chaney
- James Lee Taggart
Board of Directors, Place 5
Vote for one
- Katharine Herskovic-Feder
- Trevor Mazer
PUBLIC LIBRARY DISTRICT
Liberty Hill Public Library District
Board of Trustees
Vote for two
- Terrie Chambers
- Bob Calvisi
- Jim Wofford
WATER CONTROL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT
Lower Brushy Creek Water Control and Improvement District
Board of Directors
Vote for three
- Laine Holman
- Allen Ray David
- Mitchell Drummond
- Mark Baudek
Williamson County Water Control and Improvement District No. 2
Proposition A
THIS IS A TAX INCREASE. The issuance of $760,000,000 bonds for water, wastewater and drainage system facilities, and the levy of taxes sufficient to pay the principal of and interest on the bonds.
- For
- Against
Proposition B
THIS IS A TAX INCREASE. The issuance of $143,000,000 bonds for park and recreational facilities, and the levy of taxes sufficient to pay the principal of and interest on the bonds.
- For
- Against
Proposition C
THIS IS A TAX INCREASE. The issuance of $265,000,000 bonds for roads, and the levy of taxes sufficient to pay the principal of and interest on the bonds.
- For
- Against
Proposition D
THIS IS A TAX INCREASE. The issuance of $1,140,000,000 bonds for refunding water,
wastewater and drainage system facilities bonds and park and recreational facilities bonds
(including refunding bonds issued therefor) issued pursuant to Section 59, Article XVI of the Texas Constitution, and the levy of taxes sufficient to pay the principal of and interest on the bonds.
- For
- Against
Proposition E
THIS IS A TAX INCREASE. The issuance of $397,500,000 bonds for refunding road bonds
(including refunding bonds issued therefor) issued pursuant to Section 52, Article III of the Texas
Constitution, and the levy of taxes sufficient to pay the principal of and interest on the bonds.
- For
- Against
MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT
Ranch at Cypress Creek Municipal Utility District No. 1
Director
Vote for none, one, or two
- Stephan Zaparolli
- James E. Perrone
- Patrice Coles
River Ranch Municipal Utility District No. 1
Proposition A
The Confirmation of the Creation of River Ranch Municipal Utility District No. 1.
- For
- Against
Directors
Vote for none, one, two, three, four, or five directors
- Blake Reed
- Omar Ortega
- Tammy Weber
- Tami Schroeder
- Winston Kraus
Proposition B
THIS IS A TAX INCREASE. The Imposition and Levy of a Maintenance Tax in an Amount Not to Exceed $1.20 per $100/Assessed Valuation by River Ranch Municipal Utility District No. 1.
- For
- Against
Rivina Municipal Utility District of Williamson County
Proposition A
The Confirmation of the Creation of Rivina Municipal Utility District of Williamson County.
- For
- Against
Directors
Vote for none, one, two, three, four, or five
- Lance Jenkins
- Albert Bedia
- Clarke Nolley
- Julia Kerr
- Hunter Chamberlain
Proposition B
THIS IS A TAX INCREASE. The Issuance of $295,500,000 Utility Bonds and the Levy of Ad Valorem Taxes Sufficient to Pay the Principal of and Interest on the Debt Obligations will be Imposed to Pay for the Utility Bonds by Rivina Municipal Utility District of Williamson County.
- For
- Against
Proposition C
THIS IS A TAX INCREASE. The Issuance of $369,375,000 Utility Refunding Bonds and the Levy of Ad Valorem Taxes Sufficient to Pay the Principal of and Interest on the Debt Obligations Will be Imposed to Pay for the Utility Refunding Bonds by Rivina Municipal Utility District of Williamson County.
- For
- Against
Proposition D
THIS IS A TAX INCREASE. The Issuance of $183,500,000 Road Bonds and the Levy of Ad
Valorem Taxes Sufficient to Pay the Principal of and Interest on the Debt Obligations Will be
Imposed to Pay for the Road Bonds by Rivina Municipal Utility District of Williamson County.
- For
- Against
Proposition E
THIS IS A TAX INCREASE. The Issuance of $229,375,000. Road Refunding Bonds and the Levy of Ad Valorem Taxes Sufficient to Pay the Principal of and Interest on the Debt Obligations Will be Imposed to Pay for the Road Refunding Bonds by Rivina Municipal Utility District of Williamson County.
- For
- Against
Proposition F
THIS IS A TAX INCREASE. The Issuance of $8,320,021 Parks and Recreational Facility Bonds
and the Levy of Ad Valorem Taxes Sufficient to Pay the Principal of and Interest on the Debt Obligations Will be Imposed to Pay for the Parks and Recreational Facility Bonds by Rivina Municipal Utility District of Williamson County.
- For
- Against
Proposition G
THIS IS A TAX INCREASE. The Issuance of $10,400,027 Parks and Recreational Facility Refunding Bonds and the Levy of Ad Valorem Taxes Sufficient to Pay the Principal of and Interest on the Debt Obligations Will be Imposed to Pay for the Parks and Recreational Facility Refunding Bonds by Rivina Municipal Utility District of Williamson County.
- For
- Against
Proposition H
THIS IS A TAX INCREASE. The Imposition and Levy of a Maintenance Tax in an Amount
not to Exceed $1.20 per $100/Assessed Valuation by Rivina Municipal Utility District of Williamson County.
- For
- Against
Watch Hill Municipal Utility District
Directors Election
Vote for none, one, two, or three
- Lindsey Walker
- Cameron Krog
- Michael Koch
- John McCown
- Robert Denham
Williamson and Bell Counties Municipal Utility District No. 1
Proposition A
District
- For
- Against
Directors
Vote for five
- Ron Lusk
- Robert Norris
- Paul Otte
- Jamison Stewart
- Megan Turnipseed
Proposition B
THIS IS A TAX INCREASE. The issuance of $307,500,000 bonds for water, sanitary sewer, and drainage and storm sewer systems, including refunding bonds, and the levy of taxes, without limit as to rate, sufficient to pay the principal of and interest on the bonds. THIS IS A TAX INCREASE.
- For
- Against
Proposition C
THIS IS A TAX INCREASE. The issuance of $28,125,000 bonds for recreational facilities, including refunding bonds, and the levy of taxes, without limit as to rate, sufficient to pay the principal of and interest on the bonds. THIS IS A TAX INCREASE.
- For
- Against
Proposition D
THIS IS A TAX INCREASE. The issuance of $143,750,000. bonds for roads, including refunding bonds, and the levy of taxes, without limit as to rate, sufficient to pay the principal of and interest on the bonds.
- For
- Against
Proposition E
THIS IS A TAX INCREASE. An operation and maintenance tax for conservation and reclamation facilities authorized by Article XVI, Section 59, of the Texas Constitution, not to exceed one dollar and fifty cents ($1.50) per one hundred dollars ($100) valuation of taxable property.
- For
- Against
Proposition F
THIS IS A TAX INCREASE. An operation and maintenance tax for road facilities authorized by Article III, Section 52, of the Texas Constitution, not to exceed twenty-five cents ($0.25) per one hundred dollars ($100) valuation of taxable property.
- For
- Against
Williamson County Municipal Utility District No. 48
Proposition A
Confirmation of the district
- For
- Against
Board of Directors
Vote for none, one, two, three, four, or five
- Lena Murray
- Jason Mills
- Caroline Jones
- Gloria Caroline Ruiz
- Alexander Bregger
Proposition B
THIS IS A TAX INCREASE. The issuance of $335,625,000 in bonds and the levy of ad valorem taxes, without limit as to rate or amount, sufficient to pay the principal and interest on said bonds (water, sanitary sewer, drainage and storm sewer, organization and administration).
- For
- Against
Proposition C
THIS IS A TAX INCREASE. The issuance of $335,625,000 in refunding bonds to refund bonds issued for water, sanitary sewer, drainage and storm sewer, organization and administration, or refunding of such bonds and the levy of ad valorem taxes, without limit as to rate or amount sufficient to the pay principal and interest on said refunding bonds.
- For
- Against
Proposition D
THIS IS A TAX INCREASE. The issuance of $175,625,000 in bonds and the levy of ad valorem taxes, without limit as to rate or amount, sufficient to pay the principal and interest on said bonds (macadamized, graveled, or paved roads and turnpikes, or improvements, including storm drainage in aid of those roads).
- For
- Against
Proposition E
THIS IS ATAXINCREASE. The issuance of $175,625,000 in refunding bonds to refund bonds issued for macadamized, graveled, or paved roads and turnpikes, or improvements, including storm drainage in aid of those roads, or refunding of such bonds and the levy of ad valorem taxes, without limit as to rate or amount, sufficient to pay the principal and interest on said refunding bonds.
- For
- Against
Proposition F
THIS IS A TAX INCREASE. The issuance of $18,437,500 in park and recreational facilities bonds and the levy of ad valorem taxes, without limit as to rate or amount, sufficient to pay the principal and interest on said bonds.
- For
- Against
Proposition G
THIS IS A TAX INCREASE. The issuance of $18,437,500 in refunding bonds to refund bonds issued for park and recreational facilities or refunding of such bonds and the levy of ad valorem taxes, without limit as to rate or amount, sufficient to pay the principal and interest on said refunding bonds.
- For
- Against
Proposition H
THIS IS A TAX INCREASE. The levy of an operation and maintenance tax not to exceed one
dollar and twenty cents ($1.20) per one hundred dollars ($100.00) of assessed valuation (water, sanitary sewer, drainage and storm sewer, organization and administration).
- For
- Against
Proposition I
THIS IS A TAX INCREASE. The levy of an operation and maintenance tax not to exceed one
dollar and twenty cents ($1.20) per one hundred dollars ($100.00) of assessed valuation roads).
- For
- Against
Proposition J
THIS IS A TAX INCREASE. The levy of an operation and maintenance tax not to exceed ten cents ($0.10) per one hundred dollars ($100.00) of assessed valuation (park and recreational facilities).
- For
- Against
Williamson County Municipal Utility District No. 50
Proposition A
CONFIRMATION OF THE DISTRICT
- For
- Against
Board of Directors
Vote for none, one, two, three, four, or five
- Cristi Giguere
- Allie Coffey
- Regina Waldo
- Paige Russell
- Brandon Biggerstaff
Proposition B
THIS IS A TAX INCREASE. The issuance of $385,375,000 in bonds and the levy of ad valorem taxes, without limit as to rate or amount, sufficient to pay the principal and interest on said bonds (water, sanitary sewer, drainage and storm sewer, organization and administration).
- For
- Against
Proposition C
THIS IS A TAX INCREASE. The issuance of $385,375,000 in refunding bonds to refund bonds issued for water, sanitary sewer, drainage and storm sewer, organization and administration,
or refunding of such bonds and the levy of ad valorem taxes, without limit as to rate or amount sufficient to the pay principal and interest on said refunding bonds.
- For
- Against
Proposition D
THIS IS A TAX INCREASE. The issuance of $189,375,000 in bonds and the levy of ad valorem taxes, without limit as to rate or amount, sufficient to pay the principal and interest on said bonds (macadamized, graveled, or paved roads and turnpikes, or improvements, including storm drainage in aid of those roads).
- For
- Against
Proposition E
THIS IS A TAX INCREASE. The issuance of $189,375,000 in refunding bonds to refund bonds issued for macadamized, graveled, or paved roads and turnpikes, or improvements, including storm drainage in aid of those roads, or refunding of such bonds and the levy of ad valorem taxes, without limit as to rate or amount, sufficient to pay the principal and interest on said refunding bonds.
- For
- Against
Proposition F
THIS IS A TAX INCREASE. The issuance of $19,375,000 in park and recreational facilities bonds and the levy of ad valorem taxes, without limit as to rate or amount, sufficient to pay the principal and interest on said bonds.
- For
- Against
Proposition G
THIS IS A TAX INCREASE. The issuance of $19,375,000 in refunding bonds to refund bonds issued for park and recreational facilities or refunding of such bonds and the levy of ad valorem taxes, without limit as to rate or amount, sufficient to pay the principal and interest on said refunding bonds.
- For
- Against
Proposition H
THIS IS A TAX INCREASE. The levy of an operation and maintenance tax not to exceed one dollar and twenty cents ($1.20) per one hundred dollars ($100.00) of assessed valuation (water, sanitary sewer, drainage and storm sewer, organization and administration).
- For
- Against
Proposition I
THIS IS A TAX INCREASE. The levy of an operation and maintenance tax not to exceed one dollar and twenty cents ($1.20) per one hundred dollars ($100.00) of assessed valuation (roads).
- For
- Against
Proposition J
THIS IS A TAX INCREASE. The levy of an operation and maintenance tax not to exceed ten cents ($0.10) per one hundred dollars ($100.00) of assessed valuation (park and recreational facilities).
- For
- Against
Williamson County Municipal Utility District No. 60
Proposition A
Confirming Creation of Williamson County Municipal Utility District No. 60.
- For
- Against
Permanent Directors
Vote for none, one, two, three, four, or five
- Harrison Hudson
- Jonah Mankovsky
- Jonathan McKee
- Kyle Mitchell
- Matt Pohl
Proposition B
THIS IS A TAX INCREASE. An operation and maintenance tax for the District not to exceed one dollar and twenty cents ($1.20) per one hundred dollars ($100) valuation of taxable property.
- For
- Against
Proposition C
THIS IS A TAX INCREASE. The issuance of $231,535,000 bonds for water, wastewater, and drainage system facilities, and the levy of taxes sufficient to pay principal of and interest on the bonds.
- For
- Against
Proposition D
THIS IS A TAX INCREASE. The issuance of $181,515,000 bonds for roads, and the levy of taxes sufficient to pay principal of and interest on the bonds.
- For
- Against
Proposition E
THIS IS A TAX INCREASE. The issuance of $10,370,000 bonds for park and recreational facilities, and the levy of tax sufficient to pay principal of and interest on the bonds.
- For
- Against
Proposition F
THIS IS A TAX INCREASE. The issuance of $362,860,000 bonds for refunding water, wastewater, and drainage system facilities bonds and parks and recreational facilities bonds
(including refunding bonds issued therefor) issued pursuant to Section 59, Article XVI of the Texas Constitution, and the levy of taxes sufficient to pay principal of and interest on the bonds.
- For
- Against
Proposition G
THIS IS A TAX INCREASE. The issuance of $272,275,000 bonds for refunding road bonds (including refunding bonds issued therefor) issued pursuant to Section 52, Article III of the Texas Constitution, and the levy of taxes sufficient to pay principal of and interest on the bonds.
- For
- Against