The following races and propositions will appear on November 2026 ballots in Williamson County. Please note, what appears on a voter's actual ballot may vary based on where they live.
For a list of polling places, please click here.
FEDERAL
United States Senator
Ken Paxton — Republican Party
James Talarico — Democratic Party
Ted Brown — Libertarian Party
Write-in
United States Representative, District 11
August Pfluger — Republican Party
Claire Reynolds — Democratic Party
United States Representative, District 17
Pete Sessions — Republican Party
Casey Shepard — Democratic Party
United States Representative, District 31
John Carter — Republican Party
Justin Early — Democratic Party
Greg Stoker — Green Party
STATE
Governor
Greg Abbott — Republican Party
Gina Hinojosa — Democratic Party
Pat Dixon — Libertarian Party
Write-in
Lieutenant Governor
Dan Patrick — Republican Party
Vikki Goodwin — Democratic Party
Anthony Cristo — Libertarian Party
Kevin McCormick — Green Party
Write-in
Attorney General
Mayes Middleton — Republican Party
Nathan Johnson — Democratic Party
Tom Oxford — Libertarian Party
Comptroller of Public Accounts
Don Huffines — Republican Party
Sarah Eckhardt — Democratic Party
V. Alonzo Echavarria-Garza — Libertarian Party
Shehla Faizi — Green Party
Commissioner of the General Land Office
Dawn Buckingham — Republican Party
Benjamin Flores — Democratic Party
Neill Snider — Libertarian Party
Commissioner of Agriculture
Nate Sheets — Republican Party
Clayton Tucker — Democratic Party
Austin R. Kelly — Libertarian Party
Railroad Commissioner
Bo French — Republican Party
Jon Rosenthal — Democratic Party
Arthur DiBianca — Libertarian Party
Chief Justice, Supreme Court
Jimmy Blacklock — Republican Party
Maggie Ellis — Democratic Party
Justice, Supreme Court, Place 2, Unexpired Term
James P. Sullivan — Republican Party
Chari Kelly — Democratic Party
Justice, Supreme Court, Place 7
Kyle Hawkins — Republican Party
Kristen Hawkins — Democratic Party
Justice, Supreme Court, Place 8
Brett Busby — Republican Party
Gisela D. Triana — Democratic Party
Judge, Court of Criminal Appeals, Place 3
Thomas Smith — Republican Party
Okey Anyiam — Democratic Party
Mark Ash — Libertarian Party
Judge, Court of Criminal Appeals, Place 4
Kevin Patrick Yeary — Republican Party
Audra Riley — Democratic Party
Judge, Court of Criminal Appeals, Place 9
John Messinger — Republican Party
Holly Taylor — Democratic Party
Member, State Board of Education, District 5
Mica Arellano — Republican Party
Allison Bush — Democratic Party
State Senator, District 5
Charles Schwertner — Republican Party
Paul Thomason — Democratic Party
State Senator, District 24
Pete Flores — Republican Party
Joe Paz Herrera — Democratic Party
State Representative, District 20
Terry M. Wilson — Republican Party
Matthias-Jonah Early — Democratic Party
State Representative, District 52
Caroline Harris Davila — Republican Party
Chris Jimenez — Democratic Party
State Representative, District 136
Theodore Schramm — Republican Party
John H. Bucy III — Democratic Party
Chief Justice, 15th Court of Appeals District
Scott Brister — Republican Party
Jerry Zimmerer — Democratic Party
Justice, 15th Court of Appeals District, Place 2
Scott K. Field — Republican Party
Tom Baker — Democratic Party
Justice, 15th Court of Appeals District, Place 3
April Farris — Republican Party
Marc M. Meyer — Democratic Party
Chief Justice, 3rd Court of Appeals District
Cory Liu — Republican Party
Darlene Byrne — Democratic Party
District Judge, 277th Judicial District
Stacey Mathews — Republican Party
District Judge, 368th Judicial District
Sarah Bruchmiller — Republican Party
District Judge, 480th Judicial District, Unexpired Term
Terence Davis — Republican Party
District Judge, 512th Judicial District
Sarah Moore — Republican Party
Leslie Booker — Democratic Party
COUNTY
County Judge
Steve Snell — Republican Party
Heather Jefts — Democratic Party
Judge, County Court at Law No. 1
Brandy Hallford — Republican Party
Judge, County Court at Law No. 2
Laura Barker — Republican Party
Judge, County Court at Law No. 3
Kathryn Fowler — Republican Party
Judge, County Court at Law No. 4
David Oliver — Republican Party
District Clerk
Cathy Mendoza — Republican Party
County Clerk
Bill Fairbrother — Republican Party
Erin Block — Democratic Party
County Treasurer
Carole Callahan — Republican Party
County Tax Assessor-Collector, Unexpired Term
Catherine Totty — Republican Party
Eric Hanke — Democratic Party
County Commissioner, Precinct 2
David McDonald — Republican Party
County Commissioner, Precinct 4
Russ Boles — Republican Party
Harmon Rhea — Democratic Party
Write-in
Justice of the Peace, Precinct 1
KT Musselman — Democratic Party
Justice of the Peace, Precinct 2
Angela Williams — Republican Party
Justice of the Peace, Precinct 3
Evelyn McLean — Republican Party
Justice of the Peace, Precinct 4
Rhonda Redden — Republican Party
Williamson Central Appraisal District Board of Directors, Place 1
Hope Hisle-Piper
Clint Stephenson
Williamson Central Appraisal District Board of Directors, Place 2
Stephan Zaparoli
Williamson Central Appraisal District Board of Directors, Place 3
Mason Moses
City
City of Austin Proposition A
This is a tax increase; the issuance of bonds in the amount of $260,000,000.00 for citywide park, recreation, aquatic, and open space improvements, and the levy of taxes sufficient to pay the principal of and interest on the bonds.
☐ For
☐ Against
City of Austin Proposition B
This is a tax increase; the issuance of bonds in the amount of $35,000,000 for library facilities and the levy of taxes sufficient to pay the principal of and interest on the bonds.
☐ For
☐ Against
City of Austin Proposition C
Shall the City Charter be amended to clarify that the Independent Citizens Redistricting Commission (ICRC) is independent of City Council control, allow the ICRC to review City districts after changes to the City's boundary lines, create voter registration and residency duration exceptions for student members, provide an effective date for the redistricting plan adopted by the ICRC, increase the number of individuals in the pool of potential appointees to the ICRC, clarify the method and timing of filling vacancies on the ICRC, and allow City staff to communicate with the ICRC outside of a meeting as long as such communication complies with the Texas Open Meetings Act?
☐ For
☐ Against
City of Austin Proposition D
Shall the City Charter be amended to delete language providing that the City Council shall meet at least once each week?
☐ For
☐ Against
City of Austin Proposition E
Shall the City Charter be amended to delete language requiring the City Council to determine its rules and order of business by ordinance?
☐ For
☐ Against
City of Austin Proposition F
Shall the City Charter be amended to clarify the meaning of the term "election" and to provide that the campaign contribution and expenditure limits shall be modified each year by January 1 instead of with the adoption of the budget?
☐ For
☐ Against
City of Austin Proposition G
Shall the City Charter be amended to provide that initiative elections and petition charter amendment elections must be held on the next available November election date that occurs in an even-numbered year and that allows sufficient time to comply with legal requirements of law?
☐ For
☐ Against
City of Austin Proposition H
Shall the City Charter be amended to provide that the City Council appoints and removes the City Attorney?
☐ For
☐ Against
City of Austin Proposition I
Shall the City Charter be amended to require an Independent Affordability and Efficiency Initiative on a regular basis and before any tax rate increase election and requiring the independent contractor to identify annual and multi-year savings that exceed the cost of the contractor's service?
☐ For
☐ Against
City of Austin Proposition J
Shall the City Charter be amended to make non-substantive corrections of typographical errors, punctuation, and sentence structure, and to change or remove language that is moot or unenforceable because it has been superseded by state law or by a final court order?
☐ For
☐ Against
City of Georgetown Proposition A
The reauthorization of the local sales and use tax in the City of Georgetown, Texas, at the rate of one-fourth (1/4) of one percent (1%) to continue providing revenue for maintenance and repair of municipal streets
☐ For
☐ Against
City of Hutto Proposition A
This is a tax increase; the issuance of bonds in the amount of $48,000,000 for a new Justice Center to serve as police headquarters and the levy of taxes sufficient to pay the principal of and interest on the bonds.
☐ For
☐ Against
City of Jarrell Mayor
Lori Allen
City of Jarrell Alderman, Place 1
Daniel J. Klepac
Frederick Coy
City of Jarrell Alderman, Place 2
Tim Jordan
City of Pflugerville Council Member, Place 2
David Rogers
Ceasar Ruiz
City of Pflugerville Council Member, Place 4
Trent Barlow
De Juana "De J." Lozada
Gregory L. Harrington
City of Pflugerville Council Member, Place 6
Oscar R. Mitchell
City of Pflugerville Proposition A
Shall the City of Pflugerville City Charter be amended to authorize monthly compensation for members of the City Council in the amount of seven hundred fifty dollars ($750.00) per month for the Mayor and five hundred dollars ($500.00) per month for Council Members?
☐ For
☐ Against
City of Pflugerville Proposition B
Shall the City of Pflugerville City Charter be amended to add a new section requiring the City Council to adopt protections governing the collection, use, retention, and oversight of data, facial recognition, surveillance technologies, to establish transparent approval processes for such technologies, and to require a responsible artificial intelligence framework?
☐ For
☐ Against
City of Pflugerville Proposition C
Shall the City of Pflugerville City Charter be amended to revise the procedures for adopting ordinances, including eliminating the requirement that a proposed ordinance be read at two Council meetings and instead requiring an additional reading only when the Council determines that an amendment substantively changes the ordinance, and revising related notice and public-availability procedures?
☐ For
☐ Against
City of Pflugerville Proposition D
Shall the City of Pflugerville City Charter be amended to lower, from fifteen percent (15%) to ten percent (10%), the percentage of qualified voters required to sign a petition for an initiative, referendum, or nonbinding referendum?
☐ For
☐ Against
City of Pflugerville Proposition E
Shall the City of Pflugerville City Charter be amended to revise City Council meeting and agenda procedures, including requiring that an item submitted by a Council Member with the support of a second Council Member be placed on an agenda within sixty (60) days, requiring the Mayor to include such items on the agenda, and clarifying the Council's meeting requirements with City-created boards and commissions?
☐ For
☐ Against
City of Pflugerville Proposition F
Shall the City of Pflugerville City Charter be amended to provide that voter petition requirements be completed in compliance with state law and extending, from two (2) weeks to four (4) weeks, the deadline to file a supplementary petition after a petition is certified insufficient?
☐ For
☐ Against
City of Pflugerville Proposition G
Shall the City of Pflugerville City Charter be amended to revise the requirements governing the development and content of the City's annual budget, including requiring that the City Manager prepare and present the budget in accordance with Government Finance Officers Association budget-award guidelines, requiring comparative budget information and a five-year financial forecast, and to add a new charter section requiring a publicly accessible reporting system and final close-out reports for major capital projects?
☐ For
☐ Against
City of Pflugerville Proposition H
Shall the City of Pflugerville City Charter be amended to authorize the mayor alone to excuse the City Manager from attending a meeting?
☐ For
☐ Against
City of Pflugerville Proposition I
Shall the City of Pflugerville City Charter be amended to allow City Council to appoint residents of the city's ETJ as non-voting advisory participants on city boards and commissions?
☐ For
☐ Against
City of Pflugerville Proposition J
Shall the City of Pflugerville City Charter be amended to provide that the Mayor and City Council set the strategic direction and general policy framework of the City?
☐ For
☐ Against
City of Pflugerville Proposition K
Shall the City Charter be amended to allow public comment during removal proceedings without requiring City Council approval?
☐ For
☐ Against
City of Pflugerville Proposition L
Shall the City of Pflugerville City Charter be amended to remove the requirement that the Municipal Court Judge reside within the City?
☐ For
☐ Against
City of Pflugerville Proposition M
Shall the City of Pflugerville City Charter be amended to add a new Section 11.05 specifying how the public may participate in City Council meetings, including the submission of written comments on agenda items and participation by remote communication to the extent permitted by state law?
☐ For
☐ Against
City of Pflugerville Proposition N
Shall the City of Pflugerville City Charter be amended to make non-substantive technical and conforming corrections, including standardizing capitalization throughout the Charter; adopting language conforming with state law; and amending or deleting language that is unnecessary or duplicative of state law?
☐ For
☐ Against
City of Taylor Proposition A
Shall Section 4.1 of the Charter of the City of Taylor be amended to delete language which is redundant of and inconsistent with other sections in the Charter?
☐ For
☐ Against
City of Taylor Proposition B
Shall Section 4.2 of the Charter of the City of Taylor be amended to delete the requirement that a Councilmember shall not be indebted to the City for consistency with state and federal law?
☐ For
☐ Against
City of Taylor Proposition C
Shall Section 4.4 of the Charter of the City of Taylor be amended to provide that, if a vacancy on the City Council occurs with twelve (12) months or less remaining in the unexpired term, the City Council may, by majority vote of the remaining members, fill the vacancy at the next regularly scheduled election?
☐ For
☐ Against
City of Taylor Proposition D
Shall the Charter of the City of Taylor be amended by adding Section 4.6 to impose term limits on the offices of Mayor and City Councilmember, providing that no person may serve more than four terms in any combination of the office of Mayor or City Councilmember and that a person who has served four terms be permanently and for life ineligible to seek office or appointment to either office?
☐ For
☐ Against
City of Taylor Proposition E
Shall Section 7.1 of the Charter of the City of Taylor be amended to provide that every City Councilmember, including the Mayor, has the same power and authority as every other Councilmember except where the Mayor is given explicit duties elsewhere in the Charter; that every Councilmember has the right to place any item on the City Council agenda; that an agenda item requested by a Councilmember must be added to the agenda and may not be refused by the City Manager or the Mayor; and that the City Manager and the Mayor have the authority to determine the order of the agenda?
☐ For
☐ Against
City of Taylor Proposition F
Shall the Charter of the City of Taylor be amended by adding a new Article requiring that, before the City Council takes final binding action on a matter deliberated in executive session under a project designation, code name, or other non-identifying reference, a posted agenda item must provide enough specific information for the public to be made aware of the project, including the name of the company?
☐ For
☐ Against
City of Taylor Proposition G
Shall the Charter of the City of Taylor be amended by adding a section requiring the City Council to appoint a Charter Review Commission at least once every ten years and providing a process for appointment and review?
☐ For
☐ Against
COLLEGE
Austin Community College District Board of Trustees, Place 1
Dana Walker
Gloria Gonzales-Dholakia
Austin Community College District Board of Trustees, Place 2
Gigi Edwards Bryant
Austin Community College District Board of Trustees, Place 3
Trevor Hale
Nan McRaven
Austin Community College District - Annexation Proposition A
This is a tax increase. Approving the annexation by the Austin Community College District of the following territory: the territory in the Pflugerville Independent School District that is not already within the Austin Community College taxing district, and authorizing the imposition of an ad valorem tax for junior college purposes, which is currently set at a rate of $0.1034 per $100 valuation of taxable property.
☐ For
☐ Against
INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT
Bartlett Independent School District Proposition A
This is a tax increase. Ratifying the ad valorem tax rate of $1.28040 in Bartlett ISD for the current year, a rate that will result in an increase of 18.1708% tax revenue under the adopted tax rate as compared to the maintenance and operations tax revenue for the current year as compared to the preceding year, which is an additional $220,000.
☐ For
☐ Against
Bartlett Independent School District Proposition B
This is a property tax increase. The issuance of not to exceed $3,300,000 of Bartlett Independent School District refunding bonds for the purpose of refunding all or a portion of the principal, interest, and redemption premium on previously issued maintenance tax obligations of the District styled "Bartlett Independent School District Maintenance Tax Notes, Series 2024, dated March 1, 2024" and the levying of a tax sufficient to pay the principal and interest on the bonds and the cost of any credit agreements executed in connection with the bonds.
☐ For
☐ Against
Bartlett Independent School District Proposition C
This is a property tax increase. The issuance of not to exceed $1,000,000 of Bartlett Independent School District refunding bonds for the purpose of refunding all or a portion of the principal, interest, and redemption premium on previously issued time warrants of the District styled "Bartlett Independent School District Time Warrants, Series 2024, dated March 1, 2024" and the levying of a tax sufficient to pay the principal and interest on the bonds and the cost of any credit agreements executed in connection with the bonds.
☐ For
☐ Against
Coupland Independent School District Proposition A
This is a tax increase. Ratifying the ad valorem tax rate of $1.192200 in Coupland Independent School District for the current year, a rate that will result in an increase of 4.14 percent in maintenance and operations tax revenue for the district for the current year as compared to the preceding year, which is an additional $86,933.
☐ For
☐ Against
Florence Independent School District Proposition A
This is a tax increase. Ratifying the ad valorem tax rate of $1.0182 per $100 valuation in Florence Independent School District for the current year, a rate that will result in an increase of 9.07 percent in maintenance and operations tax revenue for the district for the current year as compared to the preceding year, which is an additional $734,420.
☐ For
☐ Against
Florence Independent School District Proposition B
This is a property tax increase. The issuance of $1,450,000 of refunding bonds for the purpose of refinancing the principal, interest on, and any redemption premium on that certain previously issued maintenance tax and revenue note of the district designated as the "Florence Independent School District Maintenance Tax and Revenue Note, Series 2015," and the levy and imposition of taxes sufficient to pay the principal of and interest on the bonds.
☐ For
☐ Against
Georgetown Independent School District Proposition A
This is a tax increase. Ratifying the ad valorem tax rate of $1.1106 per $100 valuation in Georgetown Independent School District for the current year, a rate that will result in an increase of 12.80 percent in maintenance and operations tax revenue for the district for the current year as compared to the preceding year, which is an additional $17,479,755.
☐ For
☐ Against
Leander Independent School District Board of Trustees, Place 1
Serenity Coats
Gerald Prater
Leander Independent School District Board of Trustees, Place 2
Meg Dean
Perla Muñoz Hopkins
Chitra Nedun
Leander Independent School District Board of Trustees, Place 6
Laura Marques
Leander Independent School District Board of Trustees, Place 7
Jason Embry
Paul Gauthier
Leander Independent School District - Voter-Approval Tax Rate Election Proposition A
THIS IS A TAX INCREASE. Ratifying the ad valorem tax rate of $1.1169 per $100 valuation in Leander Independent School District for the current year, a rate that will result in an increase of 3.72 percent in maintenance and operations tax revenue for the District for the current year as compared to the preceding year, which is an additional $12,066,324.
☐ For
☐ Against
Pflugerville Independent School District Board of Trustees, Place 6
Nicole Toran
Jean Mayer
Pflugerville Independent School District Board of Trustees, Place 7
Chevonne Lorigo-Johst
Round Rock Independent School District Board of Trustees, Place 3
Ayaan Moledina
Vera Southwell
Amber Feller Landrum
Gregory Andrew
Round Rock Independent School District Board of Trustees, Place 4
Alicia Markum
Round Rock Independent School District Board of Trustees, Place 5
Miriam Arora
Meghna Roy
Round Rock Independent School District Board of Trustees, Place 6
Fabian Cuero
Troy J. Evanovich
Round Rock Independent School District Proposition A
THIS IS A TAX INCREASE. Ratifying the ad valorem tax rate of $0.9484 per $100 valuation in Round Rock Independent School District for the current year, a rate that will result in an increase of 3.09 percent in maintenance and operations tax revenue for the District for the current year as compared to the preceding year, which is an additional $12,313,099.
☐ For
☐ Against
MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT
Block House Municipal Utility District Director Election
Vote for none, one, two, or three
Ashley Musso
Ryan Poppe
Sandra Martin
Tina Reckaway
Terri L. Hutton
Jaden Tipton
Nancy Winston
Matt Sanner
Highlands at Mayfield Ranch Municipal Utility District Director, Place 1
Frederick Franklin
Stacy Henderson
Highlands at Mayfield Ranch Municipal Utility District Director, Place 3
Kevin Pintar
Jerome Gaillard
Highlands at Mayfield Ranch Municipal Utility District Director, Place 5
Tracy Walpole
Karim Rashidi
North Austin Municipal Utility District No. 1 Director, Place 2
Don Conklin
North Austin Municipal Utility District No. 1 Director, Place 4
Diana Christiano
Jennifer Wiebe
Solana Ranch Municipal Utility District No. 1 Proposition A
Confirming creation of Solana Ranch Municipal Utility District No. 1.
☐ For
☐ Against
Solana Ranch Municipal Utility District No. 1 Permanent Directors Election
Vote for none, one, two, three, four, or five
Joe Birdwell
Theresa Canchola
Becky Hinojosa
Martha Mangum
Sandra Wilm
Theon Ranches Municipal Utility District No. 1 Proposition A
Confirmation of the creation of Theon Ranches Municipal Utility District No. 1.
☐ For
☐ Against
Theon Ranches Municipal Utility District No. 1 Directors Election
Vote for none, one, two, three, four, or five
Andres Martinez
Samantha Garcia
John Senko
Lauryn Pianelli
Diego Mayorga
Theon Ranches Municipal Utility District No. 1 Proposition B
THIS IS A TAX INCREASE. The issuance of $119,902,773 in bonds and the levy of ad valorem taxes, without limit as to rate or amount, sufficient to pay the principal and interest on said bonds (water, sanitary sewer, drainage and storm sewer organization and administration).
☐ For
☐ Against
Theon Ranches Municipal Utility District No. 1 Proposition C
THIS IS A TAX INCREASE. The issuance of $13,153,137 in bonds and the levy of ad valorem taxes, without limit as to rate or amount, sufficient to pay the principal and interest on said bonds (macadamized, graveled, or paved roads and turnpikes, or improvements, including storm drainage in aid of those roads).
☐ For
☐ Against
Theon Ranches Municipal Utility District No. 1 Proposition D
THIS IS A TAX INCREASE. The issuance of $179,854,159 in refunding bonds to refund bonds issued for water, sanitary sewer, drainage and storm sewer facilities and the levy of ad valorem taxes, without limit as to rate or amount, sufficient to pay the principal and interest on said refunding bonds.
☐ For
☐ Against
Theon Ranches Municipal Utility District No. 1 Proposition E
THIS IS A TAX INCREASE. The issuance of $19,729,705 in refunding bonds to refund bonds issued for macadamized, graveled, and paved roads and turnpikes or improvements, including storm drainage, in aid of those roads, and the levy of ad valorem taxes, without limit as to rate or amount, sufficient to pay the principal and interest on said refunding road bonds.
☐ For
☐ Against
Theon Ranches Municipal Utility District No. 1 Proposition F
THIS IS A TAX INCREASE. The levy of a maintenance tax not to exceed one dollar and twenty cents ($1.20) per one hundred dollars ($100.00) of assessed valuation of water, sanitary sewer, drainage and storm sewer, organization and administration, and paved roads and turnpikes.
☐ For
☐ Against
Williamson County Municipal Utility District No. 80 Proposition A
Confirming creation of Williamson County Municipal Utility District No. 80.
☐ For
☐ Against
Williamson County Municipal Utility District No. 80 Permanent Directors Election
Vote for none, one, two, three, four, or five
Jay Antala
Manasvi Ardeshana
Jwalasinh Brahmbhatt
Jaya Kafle
Parag Ratanpara
Williamson County Municipal Utility District No. 80 Proposition B
THIS IS A TAX INCREASE; an operation and maintenance tax for the district not to exceed one dollar and twenty cents ($1.20) per one hundred dollars ($100) valuation of taxable property.
☐ For
☐ Against
Williamson County Municipal Utility District No. 80 Proposition C
THIS IS A TAX INCREASE; the issuance of $210,000,000 bonds for water, wastewater and drainage system facilities, and the levy of taxes sufficient to pay the principal of and interest on the bonds.
☐ For
☐ Against
Williamson County Municipal Utility District No. 80 Proposition D
THIS IS A TAX INCREASE; the issuance of $122,015,000 bonds for roads, and the levy of taxes sufficient to pay the principal of and interest on the bonds.
☐ For
☐ Against
Williamson County Municipal Utility District No. 80 Proposition E
THIS IS A TAX INCREASE; the issuance of $17,290,000 bonds for park and recreational facilities, and the levy of taxes sufficient to pay the principal of and interest on the bonds.
☐ For
☐ Against
Williamson County Municipal Utility District No. 80 Proposition F
THIS IS A TAX INCREASE; the issuance of $340,935,000 bonds for refunding water, wastewater, and drainage system facilities bonds and parks and recreational facilities bonds (including refunding bonds issued therefor) issued pursuant to Section 59, Article XVI of the Texas Constitution, and the levy of taxes sufficient to pay the principal of and interest on the bonds.
☐ For
☐ Against
Williamson County Municipal Utility District No. 80 Proposition G
THIS IS A TAX INCREASE; the issuance of $183,025,000 bonds for refunding road bonds (including refunding bonds issued therefor) issued pursuant to Section 52, Article III of the Texas Constitution, and the levy of taxes sufficient to pay the principal of and interest on the bonds.
☐ For
☐ Against
Williamson-Travis Counties Municipal Utility District No. 1 Directors Election
Vote for Three
Hanoi Avila
David Flores
Beth Jones
Stephen Bodnarchuk Jr.
Kimberly Massaro
Linda Fabre
Thomas Vacek